Hip Resurfacing Vs Hip Replacement 2016

This article talks about some of the major differences between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.

Hip resurfacing vs hip replacement 2016.

Hip resurfacing a procedure that improves the function of your own hip joint may be a viable alternative to total hip replacement surgery. Additionally it also explores some of the possible advantages and disadvantages of hip resurfacing over hip replacement. The birmingham hip resurfacing is the answer to younger patients with severe hip pain due to arthritis. These patients are too young for a total hip replacement because of the severe limitations after the surgery.

Since its fda approval in 2006 more than 3 000 hip. Hip resurfacing is an alternative technology to total hip replacement that is aimed at treating painful conditions of the hip in younger active patients. Hip replacement alleviates pain by removing the affected bones and cartilage and replacing it with a prosthetic implant that imitates the function of the joint. Importantly hip resurfacing needn t be looked at as a temporary procedure inevitably leading to hip replacement down the road.

Hip resurfacing is a less invasive form of joint replacement surgery which is advised to only selected individuals. How does it compare to conventional hip replacement. Unlike traditional hip replacement surgery resurfacing does not remove as much of your leg bone.