Hip Resurfacing Vs Hip Replacement 2015

Additionally it also explores some of the possible advantages and disadvantages of hip resurfacing over hip replacement.

Hip resurfacing vs hip replacement 2015.

In a conventional hip replacement the pain from a diseased hip is relieved by replacing the ball and the socket. Hip replacement alleviates pain by removing the affected bones and cartilage and replacing it with a prosthetic implant that imitates the function of the joint. The hip resurfacing operation is an alternative to hip replacement and has 3 crucial advantages. This article talks about some of the major differences between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.

Hip resurfacing is a technique invented specifically for younger patients with hip problems. The difference between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement both hip surgeries are full joint replacement procedures says dr. These patients are too young for a total hip replacement because of the severe limitations after the surgery. Both surgeries treat the ball and the socket in the hip joint.

Hip resurfacing is a less invasive form of joint replacement surgery which is advised to only selected individuals. How does it compare to conventional hip replacement. This may make hip resurfacing a better choice for people who need to squat for work. Since its fda approval in 2006 more than 3 000 hip.

Unlike traditional hip replacement surgery resurfacing does not remove as much of your leg bone. The birmingham hip resurfacing is the answer to younger patients with severe hip pain due to arthritis. Hip resurfacing a procedure that improves the function of your own hip joint may be a viable alternative to total hip replacement surgery. In traditional hip replacement surgery the surgeon removes your femoral head completely instead of just capping it with a metal covering.

But there are differences in the implant materials used and in the degree to which the joint anatomy is affected. Hip resurfacing is a type of hip replacement surgery. Results from long term data show that it can last just as long or longer than traditional hip replacement in young high demand patients especially men. Hip resurfacing is a less invasive approach to hip replacement and involves removing only the affected portions of the hip joint.

Importantly hip resurfacing needn t be looked at as a temporary procedure inevitably leading to hip replacement down the road. The risk of dislocation is much lower for hip resurfacing because the ball portion of the joint can remain larger. Conventional total hip replacement while being a good option for an elderly person above 70yrs is a poor choice for young patients as it will fail rapidly.